![]() ![]() | ||
|
|
Afterwords: A Conversation Around "Making Art/Making Home" – Part 2The entries below continue the conversation that started in a September 2003 private CAN Web forum after "Making Art/Making Home," an Alternate ROOTS workshop at the 2003 Spoleto Festival USA. After we published that conversation, the participants continued to talk by e-mail through October and November, and they share their dialogue with us here. (See the original conversation for identification of some of the speakers.) Posted by Frank Martin: Hi Tina!( et alium)…okay now we are getting down to a..and please forgive me for this colloquialism..but I couldn’t resist..a…."nitty…gritty!!!..and thank you for liking me in spite of myself..first of all…and please feel free to come and picket or protest in front of my house for what I am about to say..and it would be so fantastic to have this dialogue face to face…anyway…I still feel that the "groupings" ..which we all do quite naturally, and which are extremely comforting…but these groupings are distractions from our common humanness in its most essential character…I like the groupings too!! ..but the world..like this conversation … has changed so drastically in the last 50 years that the groupings are simply no longer realistic because of what you have pointed out…we are on a shared, shrinking planet with limited resources…the resources seemed limitless long ago..when Nature was unfettered by the interference of our technological development..but now we are intruding into the machinations of things which we are unable to fully comprehend..we don’t know and cannot foresee the eventualities of our myriad forms of pollution in all of its diversity, genetic alterations to food sources, manipulation of the environment through emissions of various poisons,..and on, and on ..and on…if human survival is a basic issue for all of us in conjunction with the survival of the diverse life-forms of our little blue planet…then as a collective..beyond any geographical separations..we human things must begin working toward a global consciousness quite apart from our respective physical, cultural or social characteristics…that is the big picture. …..preserving the subset identities is important to the subsets..but the larger issue is important…or should be important… to every respirating thing on this planet…and we are endangering ourselves by our callousness…that’s all I am saying…yes…I understand perfectly your concern about the logistics of specificity…if I am ‘black" and "poor" and lacking in a sufficient awareness of the possibilities of opportunity in a world where someone else is "white" and "rich" and highly aware of the myriad possibilities…then the "I" that I have identified is at risk. for discomforture….now the ugly question…is it the responsibility of the "rich"" white" to help the "poor" "black"..???..no…I would say ..NO!…however…I do feel that it is it the RESPONSIBILITY of one human being to help another..I would say yes to that because the "black’ and the "white" are both just "human" the differences are entirely superficial…because in truth the so-called "poor" "black" may in fact help the potentially demoralized, cynical, and greedy.."rich" "white" to be a more humane individual by offering the opportunity to learn about sharing…so the two become equal…one improves in material condition..one improves in spiritual condition..in the world you suggested Tina..the two may not be perceived as equal because of the various criteria of separation…I am proposing that we bomb..literally .blast away the criteria..that is we may be aware of these..criteria as identifying devices..but their importance would be exploded…thus we may approach a kind of equal footing which would make it a privilege for the perceived "have" to share with the perceived "have not"…this is a significant cultural shift in our world..yes I acknowledge that people do exist who want to control resources…but they have not carefully examined their motivations …in Academia..in this academic and theoretical conversation..we are free to do that..to examine the possibilities of motivation.. and offer these individuals alternative perspectives on their interpretation of reality…if "race" has been permitted to become solidified into a social construct in America..it is because Americans have allowed this to happen ..black ones and white ones and red ones and yellow ones and brown ones…by failing to question the validity of the status quo….unfortunately to move forward all of this must be questioned and much may have to be discarded….I don’t want to destroy the "blues" or "history" or black power or chicano heritage…but it would be nice if we could shift some of our populace out of their intellectual prisons…and exactly what is wrong with swarthy French-speaking intellectuals anyway?????!!!! Felicia raised an interesting question about education…education is so contextual..it’s another one of those "loaded" terms..and its equation with "whiteness" is a bizarre phenomenon in American cultures and subcultures..meaning that the literature-based, archival, academically structured, linear information we commonly refer to as "education" in Western culture is equated with "whiteness" by many people trained in this Western cultural structure…but education is such a broad term…it’s more than just a certain system of structuring information…but I know many Americans of African descent attempt to reject the Westernized form of the structure because its tradition has been passed to this culture based on how its codification took place in the European model. of the Academy coming out of the Greek tradition…which had its roots in Northern Africa..in Egypt where the early ancient libraries were….so clearly the structured transmission of information is not by any means either exclusively Euro-centrist..or constructable as "white"…so I find it funny (ha-ha) that so many people actually draw this particular parallel…this speaks again to just how differently we all process information..and for me this is what is sooooooo intriguing about this entire conversation…we do all need to meet post web-talk and have a good "throttle"!!!..sorry that’s an "in-joke" that I am electing not to explain in detail..not here..anyway..that particular idea about education and race-based constructs just JUMPED out at me…and I felt simply compelled to say something…but …more later!! —Frank Martin Posted by Tina Marshall-Bradley: We keep doing this and I really am sorry but I have to comment and, I agree that the conversation must continue in this or some other format. Felicia and Frank spoke of education. Are we talking about education or schooling? I hear people use terms such as "education" to define the fact that someone has gone through a formal structured process and has been given some seal of approval. Whether that process has an articulated end result and whether individuals coming through that process can demonstrate that they meet the criteria articulated, is another conversation. But I often think of the system of transhumance that was in place in the region known as North Africa where nomadic peoples moved around in a manner that prevented any group to stay long enough for their livestock to eat the roots of the vegetation. This knowledge being passed on from generation to generation was truly an education in my mind but would not represent schooling. This structured process of knowledge transfer was critically important and impacts all of mankind to this day. Therefore, I have had the pleasure of interacting with people who hold terminal degrees (some of them hold more than one) who could not articulate a coherent thought. I have also had the pleasure of interacting with individuals, many of them high school drop outs and incarcerated who articulated ideology that was so beautiful in its simplicity that it made me want to cry. The first group would be said to be educated and the latter not, however it is the latter group of people who are marginalized by society, but who keep me as a researcher grounded and gives meaning to my work. Not because of their condition, but because they simply look at the world through a lens that is so drastically different from the lens that I look through. The former group is also necessary to my growth and development because they can at least espouse what has been written before. Both groups extremely necessary, only one recognized by our society as legitimately educated. I have come to the conclusion (at this moment) that 1. there is certainly a difference between schooling and education, and 2. education is a condition that must be defined by humans given the context of their existence and goes beyond a simple system that can be picked up by one group and dropped onto another. This is where I think that we get into centricism. There are some groups (sorry Frank) who can accept other people knowing differently from them and are more inclined to tolerate this different way of knowing. There are other groups who insist that everyone should know like they know or not only is something wrong with them, the other group is actually substandard. This group also takes that to another level by insisting that all groups know like they know or be destroyed. Kind of cryptic, but it is the way that things seem to work in the world…as I see it through my lens. —Tina Posted by Gwylène Gallimard: I had to switch out of the conversation. I know I am missing some of my earlier thoughts. To find them back I will need to plan to do an essay. In middle and high school, essays were extremely important for us and our grades (as opposed to tests which were reserved for kids with problems). I was very good at organizing my essays, very bad at writing them - And that has not changed, despite the fact that my main language as well as the context have changed. My first thoughts are for Education and Schooling. You are right: we are often
mixing them. In a simplistic way, it seems that one of them may free us $wise
as the other one may free us mind wise. My dad had little schooling although
it was expecting from him (to take over the honor of his dad killed in World
War One); my Mom had a lot of schooling for her time although it was not expected
from her as a woman. We, four girls and a boy, were expected to do good, but
not super good. Good enough to have a job without them to worry about us. But
not super good because on one hand my Dad hated intellectuals but loved us and
on the other hand, he believed women who knew too much were trouble and women
could not by nature be strong every day of the year. Organized by MOJA festival there was a really interesting discussion on Brown
Vs board of Education. Everybody agreed that if legally the matter was won,
practically today it was still not acted upon: Schooling for the White and Schooling
for the Black are not equal, Schooling within rich counties and Schooling within
poor counties are not equal… Great education for all within compulsory integrated
schooling has not happened yet. Posted by Omari Fox: "Black people are in the electric chair, but white america just hasn’t
pulled the switch yet. The reason they haven’t pulled the switch yet is because
they’re making money showing Black people strapped in in the electric chair."
—KRS-ONE "Remember, you’re not a slave, BUT Hold up, Wait a minute, based on fascinating genealogical discoveries that emerged during my family reunion it was uncovered that "oh my God, I have white ancestors!!!!", so uh oh I’m not pure Black like a thought, but never mind that, science unequivocally and ‘all that’ lets us know that everybody is from Africa, so pardon my "the man" "thisses", and "Europeans" "thats" because at the end of the day its people f*cking people. So i’m leery as to me the super artist going into your hood telling you what’s wrong with you then leaving you for dead then blaming you for not acting artsy like me. And according to the people who call themselves ‘whatever’ at the Benedict College art department, i’m not artsy at all because i dont want to be dreary and soul-less like them. Their white-ness/ blackness/ niggerness etc. would prevent them from saying that but just go to read between the lines at a critique and you’ll see. But let me close with this, the U.S. wealth is squarely built on the presence of Africans here, not to discredit any other group but lets be real. In the land of the thief and home of the slave, do we really think that white people from "old money" have any plans of coming off the cash? yeah right. The cash is going to self-insulation and self-medication and the rehab man…because how could you live with yourself??? But you cant steal from a thief so lets figure out constructive ways to take it that i will not divulge in this forum But the prison and pain that comes with having old white, eh ehm Black labor money proves Chuck D right. Except its not cool for the media to portray that type of issue or pain, but it is cool to give welfare a Black face, and show Black people in a one-dimensional aspect of poverty and squalor which i know is real but isnt that real for the human race. How do poor white people feel bout Black people getting all the attention for f*cked up living conditions, so its clearly not a color thing at all. Why does Ester Rolle have to fight to have a husband on "Good Times," get him, then the saddest day in black entertainment bottom line occurs, James the father gets killed. Why did they say the Cosby show wouldn’t work? It did because it made money. Green first, rich white upper one percentile that’s down with GW 2nd and f*ck everybody else…who isn’t making money for the…" " And as far as education? i say f*ck school, and that’s from the greatest public school educator ever. "Don’t fight the power, kill the motherf*cker." NOTE: only BLACK was capitalized. —Omari Posted by Gwylène Gallimard: The Global Hierarchy of Race Published on Saturday, September 20, 2003 by the Guardian/UK As the only racial group that never suffers systemic racism, whites are in denial about its impact. – Gwylène
Gwylene, Speaking truth is good. —Tina Posted by Frank Martin: Hi! This article was very interesting but..seemed steeped in white aggrandizement…overstating the case is as ridiculous as understating it…this articles suggests that the world perceives people who call themselves "white" as "gods"… I would be very interested to know what happened to his wife….? I felt that this article grossly overstated its case…and indeed this is a very difficult subject to discuss because of its emotional content and context…no I am not in denial about the hegemony of Eurocentrist economic intrusion globally..but that particular form of intrusion has not succeeded in obliterating all aspects of cultural integrity among other peoples..and I feel it would be a mistake to promote such an idea…overstatement of power or even potential is as much of a misrepresentation as understatement or omission…and yes I am very directly affected by Eurocentrism because I am writing to communicate through a technology primarily fostered through the agency of the United States and am communicating in English not Yoruba….but the conceptualization of the shared reality in which I am communicating is not exclusively shaped by either of those things…and the world is not actually "dominated" by any race…the perception of such a dominance may exist due to the propaganda that we have been sustained by..but propaganda is rarely fact…racism is real because people decide to perpetuate it and believe in it…this author for all of his supposed sincerity and tragedy is still harboring racist attitudes and he admits that…why support this view of reality…?? Both his attitude and the decision to support it are delusional and destructive..even self-destructive in my opinion…the world views of diverse groups do not exist in the discretion of so-called "white" people…!!! whether they have atomic weapons or not..even physical power cannot shape perceptual reality….. —Frank Martin Posted by Gwylène Gallimard: Omari, You don’t expect any response? That I don’t get it. And thanks for your post. Whether you wish it or not your voice is needed. —Gwylene Posted by Omari Fox: Yo G, you are the greatest by the way. i was enlightened by your response actually. As a poet, wordplay is critical to my craft. How can such a soft spoken diminutive person resonate so loudly? what the French would call " i know not what." I want you to meet my new girlfriend. Her name is Jenna Sae Quah. She’s Kalsominian. From the island of Noir. No seriously, you keep me sharp. Thanx.
—Omari FOX Posted by Neill Bogan Gwylene, been meaning to say, that personally I aren’t any of those things from the thesaurus, though I will submit to the word "white" (and so perhaps subject to a charge of colored-less-ness), as there is no real substitute in our current language(s). Looking out for further self-mystifying, deifying, or self-definition either positive or false-negative through the misty aura of skin. Hence I cannot deal with "white-ness" which is like some potion or excretion from a fairy story, likewise with "pale" etc., which end up as another weird re-inscription of mystique and power even if it is a negative, Golem-like power. I can deal with "white skin privilege," which uses the descriptor "white skin" to mark an active social force that I ride on every day. —Neill Bogan Posted by Omari Fox: Yo People, [Making Art/Making Home Main Page] Original CAN/API publication: October 2003 CommentsPost a comment Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |
|
||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||