We Are All Connected: Elders Share the Arts building bridges across the generation gap
This story appeared in High Performance #69/70, Spring/Summer
1995.
 |
| Generating Community participants |
"You never step in the same river twice," goes the ancient Asian
saying, and in New York you understand it every time you step out your front
door. Change is a constant in this urban river, and neighborhoods that were
once inhabited by European Jews are now the stomping grounds of new Americans
from Puerto Rico. The Polish of Brooklyn rub elbows with new neighbors from
Asia.
Through all this societal change, this ceaseless flux, says theater artist
Susan Perlstein, people become isolated, families become fragmented, neighbors
are caught in a tragedy of separation, especially the young and the old. Building
a bridge across that gap between the generations is the job Susan Perlstein
has set for herself and her cohorts in Elders Share the Arts.
Elders Share the Arts (ESTA) is a New York-based community arts organization
nationally recognized for its intergenerational work with elders and children.
This year ESTA celebrated its 15th anniversary with the publication of Generating
Community: Intergenerational Partnerships Through the Expressive Arts by
Susan Perlstein, ESTA's founding director, in collaboration with Jeff Bliss,
the intergenerational arts coordinator.
Generating Community outlines successful models for using the arts
in planning and sustaining meaningful connections between generations, and between
cultures living in the same communities. Building on ESTA's Living History work
in senior centers, hospitals, nursing homes, schools, colleges and universities,
the book is a step-by-step guide to the Living History method pioneered by ESTA
in workshops, training sessions, performances and festivals with thousands of
older adults, young people and community service professionals-in New York and
nationwide. ESTA intends it as a training manual for use not only in clinical
and educational settings, but in libraries, religious organizations, housing
projects and youth agencies.
The book outlines startlingly creative examples of their program in four culturally
transitional neighborhoods-East Harlem, Brooklyn's Northside, Flushing and Flatbush,
including groups of deaf children and elders.
We asked Susan Perlstein for permission reprint the first chapter of Generating
Community, which provides an overview of ESTA's philosophy.
—Linda Frye Burnham
"I have witnessed great change here in the seniors since the Living
History theater workshop. You can ask the doctor. They are different people
from whom they used to be. The workshop has given them a sense of being vital,
interesting and important and an essential part of who we are as a people
and community."
—Christine Cutchin, Director
Roundtable Senior Center
"At first it was difficult for me because I am a traditional teacher
and I wasn't used to the children working in committees. We've had the program
three years and I know it works."
—Northside teacher
"They teach me about what it's like to grow older."
—Northside student
"Ms. Peggy, I pray for you every day. I thank God for the Roundtable
Senior Center and for this program that sent you here to us. It's changed
my life."
—Cherry, Roundtable senior
Generating Community
Intergenerative Partnerships Through the Expressive Arts
by Susan Perlstein
Elders today still remember a time when extended families lived together and
shared each other's daily lives. Increasingly, however, elders tend to be isolated
from their communities, and especially from children, and come to feel they
are no longer useful people: no one cares about what they know; there is no
one to listen to their stories. Children, for their part, are cut off from the
elders' wisdom and caring.
In ESTA's early days, as we worked with elders to create Living History presentations
in nursing homes, senior centers, and other settings, we heard many complaints
about children. "The kids are ruining our neighborhood," some elders
would say. "There's no discipline." "I wouldn't want to be a
kid growing up today." It was this isolation of elders from meaningful
activities with children-as well as the seniors' real fear of being targeted
for ridicule and crime by young people-that inspired us to begin our program
of intergenerational workshops. We realized there was a pressing need to reinvent
family and community connections.
We started by researching model intergenerational programs. We reviewed current
literature in education, psychology, cultural anthropology, social work and
the community arts. We contacted national organizations dedicated to the elderly,
to the young and to intergenerational or multicultural issues, such as Generations
United of the National Council on Aging and the Center for Intergenerational
Learning at Temple University in Philadelphia. We asked them to describe their
programs and to refer us to other resources. Locally, we sought information
from the New York City Department of Aging and the Board of Education, as well
as from other arts and cultural organizations. We also interviewed the seniors
in ESTA's Living History program, staff in the senior centers and nursing homes,
the young people with whom we had piloted smaller projects, and their teachers.
We discovered three types of intergenerational programs: youth serving seniors,
seniors serving youth and mutual or reciprocal programs. Projects in which youth
serve seniors include "meals on wheels," "home shopping"
and "friendly visitors." Seniors serve youth in mentoring projects,
latchkey programs and foster grandparent programs. Mutual or reciprocal programs
often involve working together on a cultural, environmental or political projects.
Clearly, the reciprocal model fit our goals best. In cultural projects like
those offered in this book, young and old learn and practice new skills, cooperate,
share experiences and practice teamwork with decision making and problem solving.
Creative expression fosters self-esteem, pride, joy and a sense of accomplishment.
For a few years we experimented with many different kinds of programs, all
based on transforming oral histories into theater, dance, music and writing.
Out of this experience we developed the Generating Community program in 1991
as an answer to the concerns of cultures and generations coming into conflict.
Seeing that all these different groups had no meeting ground, we conceived of
the program as a place for them to talk-not just to complain at one another,
but to create and learn together. Instead of letting the groups face off against
each other, in Generating Community we turn everybody's head to face in the
same direction, toward a common goal. Creating this turnaround is crucial; it's
also tremendously exciting. In the Living History community plays in our programs,
the various groups explore their problems, and together find solutions to them.
In the process, something new emerges: in our program in Spanish Harlem, for
example, participating seniors have become surrogate grandparents for children
whose grandparents never left Puerto Rico.
Once we developed our basic objectives, we outlined specific goals for our
program and a list of responsibilities for the participating groups. In the
beginning, one group needs to assume responsibility for getting the program
off the ground. ESTA initiated the projects described here by researching, organizing
and fundraising. Ultimately, however, all groups must take responsibility for
a project's continuation. Here is a sticky point in partnership development:
how to inspire shared ownership of a community project. We compiled a "Partnership
Packet," which included a detailed definition and description of both the
overall project and the role and responsibilities of each partner. We drew up
a two-year contract that would commit the partnership team to figuring out how
to sustain the alliance beyond the initial project year.
We then selected four transitional neighborhoods and called school principals
and directors of senior centers to tell them about our idea. If they seemed
interested, we asked them to send us letters of interest. In turn, these letters
accompanied our requests for funding from national and state organizations and
private foundations.
Over the course of the first year, we trained staff members of the groups
we worked with, so that after the second year a different partner became the
coordinating group. In one case, the school kept the program going, and in another
the community center coordinated.
GENERATING COMMUNITY consists of a weekly workshop program that brings seniors
in nursing homes, community centers, and senior centers together with youths
ranging in age from pre-school to high school. Each program lasts for about
30 sessions. We start out by training the participants in the skills of oral
history, in order to produce life histories of both the elders and the youths.
The two groups then work together to turn their stories into theater, storytelling
or dance performances, or into murals, paintings, journal writing or poetry.
A public presentation of the work-usually as a performance, but sometimes as
booklets or other printed formats presented as part of a festival-is the crucial
community-building element of the project. The presentation may be staged at
the school, the senior center or a central public place such as a museum, library,
or theater, or at several of these locations.
The project takes two years to implement fully, and depends on three community
groups working together: a senior group, a youth group and an arts group. The
senior group may come from a senior center, library, union retirement program,
nursing home, volunteer program, adult day-care facility or church. The youth
group may come from a school, community center, or scouting or other community
youth group. The participating arts group can be a museum, arts council, community
artists' organization or settlement house. Any one of these three groups can
originate the project by linking up with the two others.
In our programs, elders from the senior group typically come together with
the young people in a workshop led by an artist who has been trained in group
work. At ESTA, we train the artists ourselves; in many cases artists can be
found through community arts groups. Many theater people and dancers have group-work
training, so do people trained in creative arts therapy. It is vital, however,
that the participating artist have training, as well as experience, in working
with groups.
During the program's first year, the artist trains program assistants from
the senior and youth groups, who then assume more responsibility for leading
the program in its second year. When the second year ends, these trained representatives
become central to the groups' ability to continue the program into the future.
This is the basic program model, but many variations are possible. We have
found that teachers will often assume the role of the teaching artist and continue
the program themselves. In some programs, we had seniors who had been artists.
The program gave them training in leading the workshop, and they took over this
role when ESTA's participation concluded.
OUR COMMUNITIES FACE MANY CHALLENGES today. Seniors encounter ageism; youth
are adrift; neighborhoods are fragmented. People often keep to their own kind.
We have found that Generating Community creates solutions to these problems.
In many urban communities, one ethnic group grows up and moves out and another
group moves in, often leaving the poorer, older people living in their neighborhood
with people from an unfamiliar culture. Feeling their world shrinking, these
elders are likely to further isolate themselves.
This isolation makes it easier for the new young people to see the seniors
as "other," and vice versa. Dissatisfied young people can easily target
the elders whom they do not know or understand, taking their free-floating anger
out on elder victims. Not surprisingly, many older adults fear young people
and avoid them.
Our initial approach to ageism is to have young people write poems about what
they think of seniors at the beginning of the program, before the groups come
together, and then again at the end, after they have spent months working together.
In this way we record the transformation of attitudes that occurs. "Seniors
are cranky people," "They don't like us" and "They're dumb"
turn into "They're my friends," "We have fun together" and
"We can do things together." We find, moreover, that young people
and seniors maintain their relationships after the program ends: they walk each
other home; the kids bring the seniors groceries; they meet on the street and
stop to exchange greetings.
Traditionally, older people functioned as role models for younger generations.
Now, the loss of opportunities for relationships with young people has robbed
elders of one of life's greatest pleasures. Generating Community gives seniors
back the chance to pass on the wisdom and skills acquired in a lifetime of experience,
to continue to care for others at a time when they themselves may be the recipients
of care, and to learn new skills, remaining creatively engaged in the world.
Young people today are often on their own in a way their parents and grandparents
never were. Working parents or guardians may leave them unsupervised; their
teachers are often overburdened and lack the time to give them personal attention.
Without these traditional support systems many young people feel unsure of their
future.
To discover their interests and direction in life, young people need opportunities
to explore ideas, feelings and possible roles in a creative way. They need to
develop emotional and social skills, as well as the skills of problem solving,
decision making, and planning for the future, which prepares them for adult
relationships and jobs and enhances their sense of self-worth. Finally, they
need situations to which they can contribute something real and meaningful,
as well as experiences that teach them responsibility and accountability.
Relationships with caring, interested adults are a key factor in helping young
people grow up. Just one person who listens to a young person's opinions, concerns
and feelings without judging can create a lifeline to self-respect. This is
a traditional role of the grandparent: reassurance and support.
Generating Community creates a setting in which this type of support can be
reborn. For example, in the Washington Heights neighborhood of Manhattan, well
known for violence and drug dealing, we brought Dominican teenagers together
with frail elderly people. We trained the kids to explore turning points in
life, and they interviewed the seniors about their work histories, asking questions
about how the elderly people found jobs when they were younger. This process
provided the teenagers with role models for solving problems and making decisions
in their own lives.
Generational problems are compounded by cultural issues. Like other metropolitan
areas in the United States, New York City's remarkable diversity remains a source
of both cultural richness and conflict. The "conflicts," however,
get most of the attention. With finite public resources and growing populations
of disadvantaged young and old, public policy often defines one group-such as
"youth at risk"-as "more needy" than another-say, "impoverished
elders." This false hierarchy of needs is based on a competitive rather
than a cooperative way of thinking. It sets groups in conflict with one another,
instead of recognizing that these groups can help each other to solve their
mutual needs, and keeps them segregated in daily life.
The lack of a community meeting ground creates a sense of alienation and prejudice
between groups that occurs primarily because they don't know each other. For
example, in Flushing, Queens, where older Eastern European adults live with
many immigrants from the Pacific Rim countries, we assigned the seniors to interview
each other about the changes that had occurred in the neighborhood. The interviews
were full of remarks like: "The Koreans should go back where they came
from-what makes them think they can take over?" But as soon as they got
to know real Korean children in the workshop, the seniors realized these kids
had the same goals that the seniors' own children once had: to get an education
and a job, and to become responsible citizens.
Sol's reaction was to tell his group of children that he would be there to
talk to them anytime; he gave them his home phone number. Erna said this was
the most important program of her life because she could give the children a
real education-and she told them of her escape from Nazi Germany. The appreciation
the seniors received from the children as they shared their life experiences
was a wonderful surprise.
GENERATING COMMUNITY'S vehicle for dispelling age and cultural stereotypes
is the process of creating an intergenerational presentation. The program offers
many young people their first real friendship with an older person. One fifth
grader said: "I thought they wouldn't be interested. I really can talk
to Sol, and he gave me his phone number." A teacher remarked,"One
caring person encouraging a child can make all the difference in that child's
life. ESTA helps make those personal connections."
On a practical level, seniors feel safer walking home when they are greeted
on the way by children they know. On a deeper level, they feel needed, useful,
and creative. "I like being with the children," said Mary. "I
feel younger, and they help keep me spry." Fanny said, "Children tell
you the truth about what is happening now. I like listening to them." Another
senior admitted, "I didn't expect to get so much. We really care about
each other and had a great time making the play."
Generating Community exemplifies lifelong learning. In sharing stories, both
seniors and youth learn about the past and the present. They get to play out
roles that give them a deeper understanding of the stages of life. For seniors,
the process reawakens a sense of what it was like to be children, and shows
them what children are like today. Young people tend to be isolated from elders;
the program connects them to the human story.
Finally, Generating Community demonstrates how culture builds community. At
our community presentations, the audience sees itself reflected in the Living
History play, or mural, or writings by young and old. "That's me they're
talking about!" they exclaim. "I like this because it's about my life
and what I care about." "I like how they spoke. It's honest and about
real life!"
One parent credited the program for the fact that her child behaved more respectfully
at home. She said that the oral history interviews brought her family closer
together and added that she was proud to see her daughter on stage. Another
parent remarked, "Every time I walk into the school and see the Community
Tree mural, I'm reminded that we are all connected."
Susan Perlstein is the
founding director of Elders Share the Arts. ESTA's intergenerational artists/teachers
include Jeff Bliss, Shelly Brenner, Fielding Dawson, Diana Halperin, Rome Neal,
Peggy Pettit, Joanne Schultz, Marion Stanton, Rhoda Waller and George Zavala.
This story originally appeared in High Performance #69/70, Spring/Summer
1995.
Original CAN/API publication: December 1999
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
|